One of the prevailing issues that the public has against the  government is their continuous belligerence in collecting taxes from any  sort of income. This includes the settlements that people get from  lawsuits. The Internal Revenue Service field agents follow an audit  guide that allows them to determine whether certain lawsuits and  settlements are taxable. Structured settlements are also being examined  even if the Structured Settlement Protection Act is already in place. As  we have mentioned before, sometimes, the way structured settlement  agreements are written allow the IRS the opportunity to tax a portion if  not the full amount.  
Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) states that all  income from whatever source derived is taxable, unless specifically  excluded by another IRC section. This means that taxation is the default  and non-taxable income is the exemption. Section 104(a)(2) is the only  provision that specifically addresses income exclusions for any type of  lawsuit proceeds.
Settlements that arise from personal injuries are long established to  be tax-exempt.  However, there are still prevailing discussion on  physical versus non-physical (mental anguish) injuries and sickness, and  whether punitive damages are received on account of personal injuries.  Damages like depression are argued to be something that should be  taxable.
Legally, this has long been settled by the Congress. In 1996, the  Congress resolved the controversy by amending section 104(a)(2).  Congress now restricted the tax exclusion to just physical injuries or  physical sickness. Since the August 21, 1996, effective date of that  amendment the IRS has a more definite guideline to work with than it had  previously.
We published a case where a settlement from an emotional injury was exempted from tax.  The case we discussed indicated that the victim treated his emotional  health as a capital which he uses for his work. Thus, the settlement he  received from it is but a return of capital and not an income. The 1996  amendment provided that personal injury recovery amounts excludable for  emotional distress are limited to actual out of pocket medical costs in  cases of non-physical injuries, such as discrimination, fraud, etc.  However, all amounts received on account of a physical injury, with the  exception of punitive damages, are excludable under section 104(a)(2),  including amounts for emotional distress.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire